GENERAL
-Yet another innovation
-Property 24/10 - 21
-Reversionary rights
LINKS
-Links (A - H)
-Links (I - Y)
INTERNATIONAL
-Confused over conveyancing
-R.I.P. HIPs
NCA NEWS
-Consumer Protection Bill
-KYC fees
-Waiver of exceptions
-Clobbering
-NCA Q's and A's: Credit providers - II
IT & THE LAWYER
-Move to technology
-Citation index
-The future
E-CONVEYANCING
-The future of conveyancing
-Combined platform
-Joint effort
PEOPLE & NEWS
-Clearance applications
-City of Johannesburg
-Credibility under fire
-Fiasco
TABLES OF COSTS
-Conveyancing Tables - July 2009
-Apportionment of fees
LAW REPORTS
-Simcha
-Northview
SECTIONAL TITLES
-Capital of nature or capital punishment
-Confusion – a response
-Paddocks Press – June 2010
WEB BYTES
-Web Bytes 295
-Web Bytes 294
-Web Bytes 293
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
-L.E.A.D updates
-On the record
-Paying your clients bills?
STATISTICS
-Figures
-Survey II
-Transfer duty collections
-Pietermaritzburg
-D O backlog statistics
BOOKS
-The Practitioner's Guide (second edition)
-The ABC of Conveyancing
   
Jordaan
28 June 2007

Jordaan v Msweli [2007] EL 188/05; ECD 488/05 - suspensive conditions in an agreement of sale of land - fulfilment, nature of - per Plasket, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION)
Case No: EL188/05;ECD488/05
Date Heard: 8/6/07
Date Delivered: 19/6/07
Not Reportable

In the matter between:

H.C.W. JORDAAN - FIRST PLAINTIFF
G. JORDAAN - SECOND PLAINTIFF

and

Z. MSWELI - DEFENDANT




In a special plea, the defendant (the seller) pleaded that two clauses of an agreement of sale were suspensive conditions in his favour and that they had not been fulfilled or waived by him. It was held that the first - a so-called subject-to-bond clause - was inserted into the agreement in favour of the plaintiffs, as purchasers, and that they were entitled to waive reliance on it as they had done. It was held that the second, which related to the furnishing of guarantees for purposes of payment of the purchase price, was not a suspensive condition but a term.

Consequently, the agreement did not fail on account of its nonfulfilment. The special plea was dismissed. Finally, the defendant failed to plead over on the merits. It was held that he should have done so, as this was the practice in this and other Divisions (although the practice in the Cape Provincial Division was somewhat different). An application for leave to plead over on the merits, which was not opposed by the plaintiffs, was granted.

Full judgment




Note that the information in this web site and or links, is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. It is supplied subject to our legal disclaimer.

Search the Digest
t


t

GhostFill